====== PEERE - References ====== ===== New ===== * Kyle Siler, Kirby Lee, Lisa Bero: [[http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/12/17/1418218112|Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping]] ===== General ===== * Wikipedia: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review|Peer review]] * Michèle Lamont: [[http://scholar.harvard.edu/lamont/publications/how-professor-think-inside-curious-world-academic-judgment|How professor think]] * [[https://blog.frontiersin.org/category/open-science-and-peer-review/|Open science and peer review]] * [[http://www.esf.org/blog/post/key-concepts-in-peer-review-who-are-the-peers-in-peer-review/|Key concepts in peer review - who are the peers in peer review]] * [[https://blog.frontiersin.org/2016/03/23/what-is-peer-review-it-depends-who-is-asking/|What is peer review? It depends who is asking]] * Science special issue (October 2013): [[http://www.sciencemag.org/site/special/scicomm/|Communication in Science: Pressures and Predators]] * Elizabeth Wager, Fiona Godlee,Tom Jefferson: [[http://www.bmj.com/sites/default/files/attachments/resources/2011/07/wager.pdf|How to survive peer review]] * Jennifer Couzin-Frankel: [[http://www.sciencemag.org/content/341/6146/606|The Web's Faceless Judges]] * John Bohannon: [[http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.summary|Who's Afraid of Peer Review?]]; [[http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6163/1170.full.pdf|The Buzz]] * Tom Jefferson, et al.: [[http://www.bmj.com/content/327/7429/1439|Get Peered!]] * Tom Jefferson: [[http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2014/10/07/tom-jefferson-emas-release-of-regulatory-data-trust-but-verify/|EMA’s release of regulatory data—trust but verify]] * Fiona Godlee, Tom Jefferson: [[http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0727916858.html|Peer Review in Health Sciences]], 2nd Edition. 2003. * Irene Hames: [[http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1405131594.html|Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice]]. 2007 * Hans-Dieter Daniel: [[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/3527602208|Guardians of Science: Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review]]. 2004 * Thomas H.P. Gould: [[http://www.amazon.com/Do-Still-Need-Peer-Review/dp/0810885743|Do We Still Need Peer Review?: An Argument for Change]]. 2012 * Shaun Goldfinch and Kiyoshi Yamamoto: [[https://www.elsevier.com/books/prometheus-assessed/goldfinch/978-1-84334-589-3|Prometheus Assessed? Research Measurement, Peer Review, and Citation Analysis]]. 2012 * Lee-Ann Kastman Breuch: [[http://www.sunypress.edu/p-3919-virtual-peer-review.aspx|Virtual Peer Review: Teaching and Learning About Writing in Online Environments]]. 2004 * A. Alan Moghissi, Betty R. Love, Sorin R. Straja: [[http://www.amazon.com/Peer-Review-Scientific-Assessment-Organizations/dp/148205888X|Peer Review and Scientific Assessment: A Handbook for Funding Organizations, Regulatory Agencies, and Editors]]. 2013 * David Shatz: [[http://www.amazon.com/Peer-Review-Critical-Inquiry-Academic/dp/074251434X|Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry (Issues in Academic Ethics)]]. 2004 * Margaret Goodwin: [[http://www.amazon.com/Peer-Review-120-Success-Secrets/dp/148885307X|Peer Review 120 Success Secrets: 120 Most Asked Questions On Peer Review - What You Need To Know]]. 2014 * Lloyd Sealy Library: [[http://guides.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/content.php?pid=209679&sid=1746812|Evaluating Information Sources]] * [[http://episciences.org/|Episciences]] * Richard Van Noorden: [[http://www.nature.com/news/mathematicians-aim-to-take-publishers-out-of-publishing-1.12243|Mathematicians aim to take publishers out of publishing]] * [[http://www.dcscience.net/?p=4873|Open access, peer review, grants and other academic conundrums]] * [[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cectic184.png|Cectic184.png]] * [[http://cszg.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/processing-the-process-systematic-reviews/|Processing the process: Systematic Reviews]] * [[http://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2014/04/11/data-peer-review-across-nih/|New Data on Peer Review Across NIH]] * [[https://peerj.com/|PeerJ]]; [[https://peerj.com/articles/|Articles]] * NIH: [[http://public.csr.nih.gov/Pages/Challenge.aspx|Challenge]]; [[http://public.csr.nih.gov/Pages/Challenge1.aspx|Challenge #1: New Methods to Detect Bias in Peer Review]] * Open Reviewing Network: [[http://openreview.net/|site]]; [[http://openreview.net/venue/icml-peer2013|ICML-peer2013]];[[http://www.springer.com/new+%26+forthcoming+titles+%28default%29/book/978-3-319-08424-4|Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries -- TPDL 2013 Selected Workshops]] * [[http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/11/11/_crappy_gabor_paper_overly_honest_citation_slips_into_peer_reviewed_journal.html?wpsrc=fol_fb|Crappy Gabor paper ...]] ===== Publishers ===== * BMJ: [[http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/peer-review-process|Peer review process]] * Science: William Harris: [[http://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/scientific-experiments/scientific-peer-review2.htm|How Scientific Peer Review Works]] * Emerald group publishing: [[http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htm|How to... survive peer review and revise your paper]]; [[http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/authors/guides/write/index.htm|How to write effectively]];[[http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/authors/guides/write/structure.htm|How to structure your article]] * [[http://www.earth-system-science-data.net/review/ms_evaluation_criteria.html|Earth System Science Data/ Review Guidelines]] * Hindawi: [[http://www.hindawi.com/journals/dpis/guidelines/|Author Guidelines]] * Nuclear Receptor Signaling: [[http://www.nuclearreceptorsignaling.com/authors/instructions/dataset|Dataset Articles]] * PLOS|one: [[http://www.plosone.org/static/policies.action|PLOS Editorial and Publishing Policies]] * Science Domain international - [[http://www.sciencedomain.org/page.php?id=sdi-general-editorial-policy#SDI_Peer_review_mechanism|Peer review mechanism]]; [[http://www.sciencedomain.org/page.php?id=comment-policy|Comment policy]] ===== Data PR ===== * [[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130917181227.htm|Beyond peer review: Finding a way to manage errors in research data]] * John Kratz: [[http://datapub.cdlib.org/2014/05/08/fifteen-ideas-about-data-validation-and-peer-review/|FIFTEEN IDEAS ABOUT DATA VALIDATION (AND PEER REVIEW)]] * Bryan Lawrence, Catherine Jones, Brian Matthews, Sam Pepler, Sarah Callaghan: [[http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/181|Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication]] * Brenda Riley: [[http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04993.html|Database publication presents unique challenges for the peer reviewer]] * Francis S. Collins, Lawrence A. Tabak: [[http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.14586!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/505612a.pdf|NIH plans to enhance reproducibility]] * [[http://www2.le.ac.uk/projects/preparde|PREPARDE]] * Pampel, H., Pfeiffenberger, H., Schäfer, A., Smit, E., Pröll, S., Bruch, C.: [[http://epic.awi.de/30353/|Report on Peer Review of Research Data in Scholarly Communication]] * Sarah Callahan: [[http://citingbytes.blogspot.hu/2013/08/how-to-review-dataset-couple-of-case.html|Citing Bytes - Adventures in Data Citation]] * Dorothea Salo: [[http://scienceblogs.com/bookoftrogool/2009/11/24/peer-review-data-quality-and-u/|Peer review, data quality, and usage metrics]] * Marjan Grootvel, Jeff van Egmond: [[http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/viewFile/221/290|Peer-Reviewed Open Research Data]] ===== Modeling ===== * [[http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~jleek/peerreview/|The Peer Review Game]] ===== Grants PR ===== * [[http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201210_02_e_37346.html|2012 Fall Report of the Auditor General of Canada]] * [[http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/gcr-esc/docs/2008/ragcp-rapsc-eng.asp|ARCHIVED - The Government of Canada Action Plan to Reform the Administration of Grant and Contribution Programs]] * [[http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/report/orp/2011/hia-vih01-eng.asp|Horizontal Internal Audit of the Grants and Contributions Management Control Framework in Large Departments and Agencies— Phase 1]] * [[http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pa/ev-gc/index-eng.shtml|394-2-87 Evaluation of Grants and Contributions Programs]] * NIH: [[http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer_review_process.htm|Peer Review Process]]; [[http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/peer.htm|Peer Review Policies & Practices]] * [[http://www.nigms.nih.gov/research/evaluation/Pages/default.aspx|NIH: Evaluation: Measuring What Works]] * NIH: [[http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/meetings/EnhancingPeerReviewACD2-21-08.pdf|Peer Review Process]] * [[http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/|Enhancing Peer Review Home at NIH]] * [[http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peerreview22713webv2.pdf|NIH Peer Review: Grants and Cooperative Agreements]] ===== Books PR ===== * NN: Peer Review and Design Competition * Arthur, Bennett, Huffcutt: Conducting Meta-Analysis Using SAS * Bohning, Rattanasiri, Kuhnert: MetaAnalysis of Binary Data Using Profile Likelihood * Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, Rothstein: Introduction to MetaAnalysis * Boyer: Scholarship Reconsidered; Priorities of professoriate * Card: Applied MetaAnalysis for Social Science Research * Chen, Peace: Applied Meta-analysis with R * Cohen: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences * Committee: On Alternative Funding Strategies for DODs Peer Reviewed Medical Research Programs; Strategies to Leverage Research Funding * Cooper, Hedges, Valentine: Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis * Cumming: Understanding the new statistics * Daniel: Guardians of Science Peer review * Davey, Savla: Statistical Power Analysis with Missing Data * Egger, Smith, Altman: Systematic reviews_health care * Ellis: The Essential Guide to Effect Size * Fontichiaro, Petelinsek: Review It; Helping Peers Create Their Best Work * Glaser, Strauss: The discovery of grounded theory * Godlee, Jefferson: Peer Review in Health Science * Goldfinch, Yamamoto: Prometheus Assessed Research Measurement Peer Review and Citation Analysis * Hames: Peer Review and Manuscript Management * Hartung, Knapp, Sinha: Statistical metaAnalysis with applications * Harzing:The Publish or Perish Book; Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis * Hattie, Yates: Visible Learning * Hedges, Olkin: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis * Higgins, Green: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions * Hunter, Schmidt: Methods of Meta-analysis * Kastman-Breuch: Virtual Peer Review; Teaching and Learning About Writing in Online Environments * Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, Antes: Systematic reviews_evidence based medicine * Kuhn: The structure of scientific revolutions * Kuhn, Conant: The Copernican Revolution * Kulinskaya, Morgenthaler, Staudte: MetaAnalysis * Kumar, Chubin: Science, Technology and Society * Lamont: How Professors Think * Leandro: Meta-analysis in Medical Research * Littell, Corcoran, Pillai: Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalysis * Lock, Wells, Farthing: Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research * McGinty: Gatekeepers of Knowledge; Journal Editors * Merton, Storer: The Sociology of Science * Murphy, Myors: Statistical Power Analysis * Nalimov: Teoriya eksperimenta * Nalimov: Veroyatnostnaya model yazika * Nalimov, Mulchenko: Naukometriya * NAP: Peer Review and Design Competition in the NNSA * Petticrew, Roberts: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences * Pigott: Advances in MetaAnalysis * Rossi, Freeman, Lipsey: Evaluation A Systematic Approach * Rothstein, Sutton, Borenstein: Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis * Sachs, Parsell: Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education * Spyns, Vidal: Scientific Peer Reviewing; Practical Hints and Best Practices * Sterne: MetaAnalysis; An Updated Collection * Torgerson: Systematic reviews * Wager, Godlee, Jefferson: How to survive peer review ===== Software PR ===== * Kazuki Hamasaki, et al.: [[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2487096|Who does what during a code review? datasets of OSS peer review repositories]] * Karl Wiegers: [[http://www.amazon.com/Peer-Reviews-Software-Practical-Guide/dp/0201734850|Peer Reviews in Software: A Practical Guide]]. 2001 ===== Other Media PR ===== ===== Patents review ===== ===== Data sets ===== * [[http://www.cgdev.org/publication/data-set-peer-review-social-science-research-global-health-view-through-correspondence|Data Set for "Peer Review of Social Science Research in Global Health: A View Through Correspondence Letters to The Lancet - Working Paper 371"]] * NAIST, Laboratory for Software Design & Analysis: [[http://sdlab.naist.jp/reviewmining/|Review Data Sets]] ===== Tools ===== * [[http://www.precisiondiscovery.com/technology-assisted-review.asp|Technology Assisted Review and Analytics]] ===== Hoax ===== * [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair|Sokal affair]] * [[http://thatsmathematics.com/blog/archives/102|Mathgen paper accepted!]]; [[http://thatsmathematics.com/mathgen/|Mathgen]] * Paul Taylor: [[http://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2012/10/17/paul-taylor/stochastically-orthogonal/|Stochastically orthogonal]] ===== Bag ===== * [[http://www.edrm.net/projects/dataset|The EDRM Data Set Project]]