PEERE - References

Kyle Siler, Kirby Lee, Lisa Bero: Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping

Wikipedia: Peer review

Michèle Lamont: How professor think

Open science and peer review

Key concepts in peer review - who are the peers in peer review

What is peer review? It depends who is asking

Science special issue (October 2013): Communication in Science: Pressures and Predators

Elizabeth Wager, Fiona Godlee,Tom Jefferson: How to survive peer review

Jennifer Couzin-Frankel: The Web's Faceless Judges

John Bohannon: Who's Afraid of Peer Review?; The Buzz

Tom Jefferson, et al.: Get Peered!

Tom Jefferson: EMA’s release of regulatory data—trust but verify

Fiona Godlee, Tom Jefferson: Peer Review in Health Sciences, 2nd Edition. 2003.

Irene Hames: Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice. 2007

Hans-Dieter Daniel: Guardians of Science: Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review. 2004

Thomas H.P. Gould: Do We Still Need Peer Review?: An Argument for Change. 2012

Shaun Goldfinch and Kiyoshi Yamamoto: Prometheus Assessed? Research Measurement, Peer Review, and Citation Analysis. 2012

Lee-Ann Kastman Breuch: Virtual Peer Review: Teaching and Learning About Writing in Online Environments. 2004

A. Alan Moghissi, Betty R. Love, Sorin R. Straja: Peer Review and Scientific Assessment: A Handbook for Funding Organizations, Regulatory Agencies, and Editors. 2013

David Shatz: Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry (Issues in Academic Ethics). 2004

Margaret Goodwin: Peer Review 120 Success Secrets: 120 Most Asked Questions On Peer Review - What You Need To Know. 2014

Lloyd Sealy Library: Evaluating Information Sources

Episciences

Richard Van Noorden: Mathematicians aim to take publishers out of publishing

Open access, peer review, grants and other academic conundrums

Cectic184.png

Processing the process: Systematic Reviews

New Data on Peer Review Across NIH

PeerJ; Articles

NIH: Challenge; Challenge #1: New Methods to Detect Bias in Peer Review

Open Reviewing Network: site; ICML-peer2013;Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries -- TPDL 2013 Selected Workshops

Crappy Gabor paper ...

BMJ: Peer review process

Science: William Harris: How Scientific Peer Review Works

Emerald group publishing: How to... survive peer review and revise your paper; How to write effectively;How to structure your article

Earth System Science Data/ Review Guidelines

Hindawi: Author Guidelines

Nuclear Receptor Signaling: Dataset Articles

PLOS|one: PLOS Editorial and Publishing Policies

Science Domain international - Peer review mechanism; Comment policy

Beyond peer review: Finding a way to manage errors in research data

John Kratz: FIFTEEN IDEAS ABOUT DATA VALIDATION (AND PEER REVIEW)

Bryan Lawrence, Catherine Jones, Brian Matthews, Sam Pepler, Sarah Callaghan: Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication

Brenda Riley: Database publication presents unique challenges for the peer reviewer

Francis S. Collins, Lawrence A. Tabak: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility

PREPARDE

Pampel, H., Pfeiffenberger, H., Schäfer, A., Smit, E., Pröll, S., Bruch, C.: Report on Peer Review of Research Data in Scholarly Communication

Sarah Callahan: Citing Bytes - Adventures in Data Citation

Dorothea Salo: Peer review, data quality, and usage metrics

Marjan Grootvel, Jeff van Egmond: Peer-Reviewed Open Research Data

The Peer Review Game

2012 Fall Report of the Auditor General of Canada

ARCHIVED - The Government of Canada Action Plan to Reform the Administration of Grant and Contribution Programs

Horizontal Internal Audit of the Grants and Contributions Management Control Framework in Large Departments and Agencies— Phase 1

394-2-87 Evaluation of Grants and Contributions Programs

NIH: Peer Review Process; Peer Review Policies & Practices

NIH: Evaluation: Measuring What Works

NIH: Peer Review Process

Enhancing Peer Review Home at NIH

NIH Peer Review: Grants and Cooperative Agreements

NN: Peer Review and Design Competition

Arthur, Bennett, Huffcutt: Conducting Meta-Analysis Using SAS

Bohning, Rattanasiri, Kuhnert: MetaAnalysis of Binary Data Using Profile Likelihood

Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, Rothstein: Introduction to MetaAnalysis

Boyer: Scholarship Reconsidered; Priorities of professoriate

Card: Applied MetaAnalysis for Social Science Research

Chen, Peace: Applied Meta-analysis with R

Cohen: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

Committee: On Alternative Funding Strategies for DODs Peer Reviewed Medical Research Programs; Strategies to Leverage Research Funding

Cooper, Hedges, Valentine: Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis

Cumming: Understanding the new statistics

Daniel: Guardians of Science Peer review

Davey, Savla: Statistical Power Analysis with Missing Data

Egger, Smith, Altman: Systematic reviews_health care

Ellis: The Essential Guide to Effect Size

Fontichiaro, Petelinsek: Review It; Helping Peers Create Their Best Work

Glaser, Strauss: The discovery of grounded theory

Godlee, Jefferson: Peer Review in Health Science

Goldfinch, Yamamoto: Prometheus Assessed Research Measurement Peer Review and Citation Analysis

Hames: Peer Review and Manuscript Management

Hartung, Knapp, Sinha: Statistical metaAnalysis with applications

Harzing:The Publish or Perish Book; Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis

Hattie, Yates: Visible Learning

Hedges, Olkin: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis

Higgins, Green: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Hunter, Schmidt: Methods of Meta-analysis

Kastman-Breuch: Virtual Peer Review; Teaching and Learning About Writing in Online Environments

Khan, Kunz, Kleijnen, Antes: Systematic reviews_evidence based medicine

Kuhn: The structure of scientific revolutions

Kuhn, Conant: The Copernican Revolution

Kulinskaya, Morgenthaler, Staudte: MetaAnalysis

Kumar, Chubin: Science, Technology and Society

Lamont: How Professors Think

Leandro: Meta-analysis in Medical Research

Littell, Corcoran, Pillai: Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalysis

Lock, Wells, Farthing: Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research

McGinty: Gatekeepers of Knowledge; Journal Editors

Merton, Storer: The Sociology of Science

Murphy, Myors: Statistical Power Analysis

Nalimov: Teoriya eksperimenta

Nalimov: Veroyatnostnaya model yazika

Nalimov, Mulchenko: Naukometriya

NAP: Peer Review and Design Competition in the NNSA

Petticrew, Roberts: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences

Pigott: Advances in MetaAnalysis

Rossi, Freeman, Lipsey: Evaluation A Systematic Approach

Rothstein, Sutton, Borenstein: Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis

Sachs, Parsell: Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education

Spyns, Vidal: Scientific Peer Reviewing; Practical Hints and Best Practices

Sterne: MetaAnalysis; An Updated Collection

Torgerson: Systematic reviews

Wager, Godlee, Jefferson: How to survive peer review

Kazuki Hamasaki, et al.: Who does what during a code review? datasets of OSS peer review repositories

Karl Wiegers: Peer Reviews in Software: A Practical Guide. 2001

Data Set for "Peer Review of Social Science Research in Global Health: A View Through Correspondence Letters to The Lancet - Working Paper 371"

NAIST, Laboratory for Software Design & Analysis: Review Data Sets

Technology Assisted Review and Analytics

Sokal affair

Mathgen paper accepted!; Mathgen

Paul Taylor: Stochastically orthogonal

The EDRM Data Set Project