This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— |
notes:cost:peere:vb [2016/05/29 01:32] (current) vlado created |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== PEERE refs / VB ====== | ||
+ | * http://www.easychair.org/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Horizon 2020 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/master_calls.html|Call]] | ||
+ | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/calls/h2020-garri-2015-1.html|garri-2015]]; [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/2410-garri-4-2015.html|4]]; [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/9074-garri-9-2015.html|9]] | ||
+ | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/calls/h2020-ict-2015.html|ict-2015]] | ||
+ | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/calls/h2020-euro-society-2015.html|euro-society-2015]] | ||
+ | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/calls/h2020-inso-2015.html|inso-2015]] | ||
+ | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/calls/h2020-scc-2015.html|scc-2015]] | ||
+ | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/calls/h2020-fct-2015.html|fct-2015]] | ||
+ | * [[http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/calls/h2020-reflective-6-2015.html|reflective-6-2015]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Project ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 1. Conceptualization ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why is the review needed? Functions of review: | ||
+ | - funding | ||
+ | - promotion | ||
+ | - archiving | ||
+ | |||
+ | Objects: papers, grants, patents, books, media, ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | Traditional papers were/are printed. They are unchangeable. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Today's technology permits to view the paper as an object in evolution: versions, comments, references, supplementary materials, opinions, color, influence (citing papers). Different reviewing strategies can be applied. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 2. Evaluation of traditional PR ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Descriptions of review process. Sources of data. Data sets. Additional data about reviewers: age, gendre, nationality, hirsh index, keywords, activity, ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | Quality of reviews. Repeating the reviews of selected works (sample) and comparing the results - stability? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Study of historical data about the reviewing process in selected journals/funds. Bias. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Attracting and motivating reviewers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | TD-IDF distributions in general texts. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 3. Prevention and detection of cheating ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Forms of cheating. Plagiarism. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Detection. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 4. Tools for support of the reviewing process ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Helping authors to select the right journal(s). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Detection of plagiarism. Copyrights. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Checking the language. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Determining the topic(s) of a work. Searching for competent reviewers | ||
+ | using the collaboration network and keywords. Reducing the conflict of interests. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Similar works. "Missing" references. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fast filtering of works in case of large number (conferences, projects). Accept/reject. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Notes ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http://www.easychair.org/faq.cgi|Easychair]]: Note also that our non-free licenses include a service making it possible for you to make copies of all your conference data in the Excel and XML format at any time. | ||
+ | |||
+ | http://www.easychair.org/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Magistrska tema ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Podatkovna podpora recenzij** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Raziskovalci ustvarjajo raznovrstne izdelke: poročila, članke, knjige, predloge projektov, patente, ... Večkrat je potrebno posamezne izdelke ovrednotiti (pregledati, recenzirati). To so razmeroma zahtevni postopki, ki pa jih bi bilo mogoče marsikje olajšeti z uporabo ustreznih programskih orodij: preverjanje izvirnosti (odkrivanje plagiatov), preverjanje jezikovne pravilnosti, ocenjevanje izvirnosti, izbira ustreznih recenzentov, seznam izdelkov s podobno vsebino, skladnost s tematiko revije, ... |